Friday, April 3, 2009

"Living popular scientist" poll


Who is your choice for living "popular" scientist?

Brian Greene...0
Freeman Dyson...3
Lawrence Krauss...0
Neil deGrasse Tyson...2
Stephen Hawking...3

Somewhat surprised. I suppose Hawking would lead...he is quite an icon. I expected Krauss to be at the bottom...claim to fame mostly with the physics of "Star Trek". But I did think that Greene would be favored with his "Elegant Universe" material. Tyson may have shot himself in the foot with the Pluto statement. Dyson is for older individuals expressing a little more wisdom.

Brian Greene:

"Put a Little Science in Your Life"...please

Freeman Dyson:

A birthday celebration today-- Freeman Dyson...#85

Freeman Dyson--optimist

Lawrence Krauss:

Krauss & Jeremijenko on a date and discuss science

Neil deGrasse Tyson:


Neil deGrasse Tyson...new representative

Neil deGrasse Tyson..."NOVA scienceNow"--2nd season

Pluto, Tyson, CNN lecture


"The Pluto Files" by Neil deGrasse Tyson


Tyson, Weintraub, Tombaugh & Pluto

Tyson's interview with "Time" on Pluto and planets

Stephen Hawking:

Another review of Stephen and Lucy Hawking's children's book

"George's Secret Key to the Universe"--Stephen Hawking & daughter Lucy

Hawking, Einstein, Africa


Hawking--England or Canada...makes no difference

Job application...Lucasian professor of mathematics

Peter Higgs vs Stephen Hawking

Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

S. Hawking documentary

S. Hawking to Canada


Stephen Hawking's warnings

Space exploration?...Stephen Hawking's perspective

Stephen Hawking..."Master of the Universe"--documentary


Popularization of science

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Thomas Gold--maverick scientist

Thomas Gold
May 22nd, 1920 to June 22nd, 2004

Sometimes scientists are quiet and sometimes they are mavericks exhibiting unconventional methodologies and spouting wild hypotheses. Sometimes the hypotheses are correct. Sometimes they stir great controversies and debates. Such was the life of Thomas Gold. He worked with the refinement of radar for the British; studied auditory phenomena of the ear, fought for the steady state cosmological theory, irritated NASA, and rocked geologists by refuting the origin of natural gas and oil.

"Thomas Gold"

The science maverick who challenged establishment thinking - and quite often turned out to be right

by

Anthony Tucker

June 25th 2004

The Guardian

Professor Thomas "Tommy" Gold, who has died aged 84, was the initiator, the pragmatist and the persuader among the trio of young Cambridge scientists who turned cosmology upside down in the 1950s by proposing their controversial and comforting "steady state" hypothesis of the universe. This held centre stage for several years, with Fred Hoyle as its underpinning cosmological philosopher, Hermann Bondi in mathematical support, and Tommy Gold as its extrovert propagandist.

Gold, some years younger than Hoyle, was the natural athlete of the trio, both academically and physically. He could leap easily from engineering to physiology, from physiology to cosmology and on to almost any other speciality. Closed academic cliques feared him. Throughout his life he would dive into new territory to open up problems unseen by others - in biophysics, astrophysics, space engineering, or geophysics.

Controversy followed him everywhere. Possessing profound scientific intuition and open-minded rigour, he usually ended up challenging the cherished assumptions of others and, to the discomfiture of the scientific establishment, often found them wanting. His stature and influence were international.

The "steady state" trio were regarded as mavericks in the 1950s although, among other things, Bondi later became chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence. As a group they first worked together on Admiralty radar research in 1942. Before this, however, Gold had met and befriended Bondi in the internment camps in Britain and Canada where both had ended up - with many other highly expert and loyal academic refugees from Hitler - as "enemy aliens" during the 1940 panic about fifth columnists.

When internment came, Gold was studying engineering at Trinity College Cambridge, while Bondi was doing mathematics and physics. Both came from Vienna. Gold's athletic physique matched his academic agility. He was a good climber and an expert skier (as probably befits anyone who came to Cambridge via education at Zuoz College, Switzerland), but naturally practical and highly gifted in other kinds of sport. He was therefore exactly the kind of well set up, handsome young man who, at Cambridge, was able to live life to the full.

Internment hit him hard. He was enjoying himself and well on his way to his tripos. But a darker reason for distress was that, with difficulty, he had accepted that his whole academic future lay, not in his homeland Austria, nor in Germany, but in Britain or the United States. To be locked up by the hand that seemed to be protecting him was unexpected and disconcerting. However, like many who were swept indiscriminately into camps, he believed that the mistake would soon be rectified.

In the event this took over 15 months and turned out to be a wearing and dispiriting process. But on the first night of internment, in a bare army barracks in Bury St Edmunds, he met Hermann Bondi, his fellow Austrian and Trinity student. They had not met before, even though their parents had known each other in Vienna. Their friendship changed their lives.

In the camps Bondi kept spirits up by giving ad-hoc lectures on various aspects of mathematics, and Gold soon realised that his own mathematics were unimpressive. At first infuriated by Bondi's natural skills - and his ability to dismiss Gold's hard-worked and mountainous calculations at a glance by spotting errors of scale - Gold grappled seriously with his limitations and won.

His personal philosophy was that intelligence is not specific. If you are very good at one thing, he would say, then you can be very good at everything else. Like the rest of Gold's life, this triumph over mathematics demonstrated that, in his case, the philosophy was true.

Released from internment, he took his degree and, at the request of Hoyle and Bondi and with (eventual) official approval, joined them in secret Admiralty research into problems of radar ground clutter. In the way of wartime boffins, they worked as a group, generally in remote locations, and largely fending for themselves.

For two years they shared a farm cottage near Dunsfold, Surrey, where Gold naturally took command of practical things, like finding a daily and cooking. Hoyle visited during the week and the radar work was demanding. But off-duty hours were dominated by intense and wide-ranging scientific discussion.

Gold emerged from the cold comfort of this extended wartime seminar aware of a host of new problems in astrophysics and cosmology and much better equipped to investigate them. It turned out that the electron dynamics of the magnetron, at the heart of radar, has similarities to the dynamics of stellar accretion. Hence it related to the theory of matter dispersed throughout space, to gravitational accretion and to hypotheses put forward before the war by Hoyle and Raymond Lyttleton. But it was Gold who first suggested that, whatever the turbulence and violence of galaxies or stellar systems, the energy balance of the universe would remain stable if matter were being continuously created and destroyed in equal amounts.

It was many years before this comforting and rather God-like idea succumbed to the Big Bang, although the steady-state theory was still reverberating gently in 1980, when Cornell University held a world level symposium in Gold's honour, the contributions to which were later published as a collective festschrift.

In the introduction to the book, Professor Edwin Saltpeter, who was studying electrodynamics at Cambridge in the late 1940s, recalls that at this time Gold had switched from the Cavendish Laboratory to the Medical Research Council's physiology laboratory, where he was working on a resonance hypothesis for human hearing.

Gold's approach to research was awe inspiring, says Saltpeter. It somehow managed to combine three incompatible ingredients: willingness to question any basic principle; the application of an engineer's ability to analyse complex systems; and an interest in detailed evidence even if it were not quantitative. "Are servomechanisms generally important in physiology?" Gold asked. "Were Beethoven's musicality and his particular kind of deafness related to the small change from a sharply resonant amplifier to an oscillator?" It is now recognised that feedback mechanisms play an important role and, although Tommy Gold's papers are seldom read, physiologists pay more attention to such mechanisms than they did. They may owe far more to Gold's two years of research than they realise.

In the 1950s, Gold switched back to astronomy, becoming chief assistant at the Royal Greenwich Observatory, where he raised a host of uncomfortable questions about stellar dynamics and produced a complex mathematical model, which became known as the "Gold-Hoyle hot universe".

Although superseded, this is still highly relevant to some aspects of modern x-ray astronomy. Yet, even though highly productive, Gold felt limited and out of place in the narrow and introspective academic confines of Britain. He therefore sought wider horizons. In 1956, he was offered and took the chair of astronomy at Harvard and never looked back.

He made an extraordinary series of contributions across the spectrum of planetary and astronomical sciences, being swept on to various US national committees and becoming a much sought-after NASA consultant. In 1959, he took the directorship of a new centre for radio-physics and space research at Cornell University, a context within which his extrovert originality had great freedom and where he remained for the rest of his life, becoming emeritus in 1981.

One of the most dramatic demonstrations of his genius was the speed and rigour with which, in 1968-69, he showed that the "pulsars", just discovered by the radio astronomers Antony Hewish and Jocelyn Bell, working under Sir Martin Ryle in Cambridge, must contain rotating neutron stars. This revealed huge new vistas of possibility, for if neutron stars exist in a galaxy, then, as Dennis Sciama later wrote, it is only a short step to accepting that black holes also exist. Gold opened the door for Hawking.

He also generated many controversies. In the 60s, on the run-up to the manned space programme and a possible lunar landing, there was much confused debate about the nature of the surface of the moon. Was it hard rock or was there a deep layer of fine dust? If the moon lander and its astronauts had to cope with dust layers that were metres thick, then designers needed to know, and know quickly.

By making use of evidence from microimpacts, moon cratering, electrostatic fields, and various other tools, Gold made a prediction the astronaut's boots would sink in no more than three centimetres. Within the range of possibilities, this turned out to be very close to the truth. But his critical and popular approach had infuriated other experts. He spoke and wrote about "moon dust" instead of "the lunar regolith", and quickly came under attack for being a centimetre or two wrong.

Then, in the late 70s and early 80s, when the world was taking serious stock of its energy resources, Gold pointed out that some old, deep and theoretically exhausted gas boreholes were still producing methane at a low but constant rate. Isotopic dating suggested that a large proportion of this gas was very old.

Gold suggested that we might be seeing primeval methane, trapped during the formation of the planet, but continuously rising from the deep interior of the earth. His calculations suggested that the volume might be prodigious and hence of extreme importance. Further, this rising gas could be routed to - and trapped in - major fault structures, and therefore a factor that could both trigger earthquakes and render them predictable.

These hypotheses, cutting directly across the received wisdoms of narrow fields of science in which Gold had no recognised expertise, infuriated some. Small, deep, experimental boreholes, put down in the 80s by the Swedish government to test Gold's deep gas hypothesis, yielded only a small volume of gas, but it seemed to be ancient methane and it continues to flow. Gold later altered his hypothesis to propose a "deep, hot biosphere" of methane-producing organisms and has been proved resoundingly right.

In the 80s and 90s Gold became increasingly disenchanted with the structure, achievements and scientific credibility of NASA. He drew sharp attention to the loss of high quality scientists and engineers, to the incestuous nature of many scientific contracts, to the financial pressures being used to suppress criticism and to the tragic technical mismanagement of some major projects, like the Hubble telescope. He was very unhappy and unable to answer his own question: is it possible that institutional corruption has become so pervasive that NASA can no longer hold together a body of scientists and engineers of the calibre required for their ambitious plans? To be sure, NASA's sails were trimmed. But only time will bring an answer.

Throughout his life, Gold was boisterous, amusing and direct. He was also one of the most entertaining academic speakers of his time, on either side of the Atlantic. Quite apart from his rapier-like critical wit, he was able to keep lay listeners fascinated and delighted by the unexpected mathematical elegance of everyday things, like the number of dimples in a golf ball.

Not surprisingly, he was also a great family man. He married twice: to Merle Tuberg when at Cambridge in 1947, by whom he had three daughters; and to Carvel Beyer in 1972, by whom he had one daughter. Cosmology may be full of eternal question marks, he once said, but life is here and now. That was Tommy Gold.

"Remembering Cornell's Tommy Gold: big thinker, bigger personality"

by

David Brand

October 21st, 2004

Cornell Chronicle

"And here," said Yervant Terzian, "is a picture of Tommy at a very young age, trying to tell you that you are wrong."

The pictures of Cornell's legendary polymath astronomer Thomas "Tommy" Gold that were flashed on a screen at Barnes Hall on Oct. 13 were part of a more-than-two-hour memorial tribute, both humorous and heartfelt, to Gold, who died on June 22. The anecdotes and remembrances by family, colleagues and friends gave proof to the essential character of Gold: an original and protean thinker, a generous father and a fiercely competitive sportsman.

As Terzian, the David C. Duncan Professor in the Physical Sciences, who was hired by Gold in 1965, noted: "Whatever he undertook, he always did with enthusiasm and confidence." He added, "Tommy was a star, and everybody knew that."

Gold retired in 1987 after nearly three decades on campus, during which time he rebuilt the astronomy department, built the Space Sciences Building and helped establish the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. He also explored a host of research areas, from the instability of the Earth's axis of rotation, dust on the lunar surface and cosmic rays from the sun, to the arrow of time, the nature of pulsars and terrestrial sources of hydrocarbons.

Cornell President Emeritus Dale Corson recalled that he hired Gold in 1959 because "we liked the torrent of ideas that flowed from him." Steven Soter, of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, said his former mentor and collaborator had "courage combined with genius that allowed him to accomplish so much."

But amid the many stories of accomplishment and legend, there were also reminiscences that were both personal and nostalgic. Two of Gold's daughters, Lauren Gold and Tanya Vanasse, spoke of a father who would at once would lecture them on relativity theory and then teach them to ski, both on water and snow. And two of Gold's oldest colleagues, Sir Hermann Bondi of the University of Cambridge and Freeman Dyson of the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J., looked back over six decades to the early years of World War II when Gold had been released by the British from internment as an enemy alien to work for the British Admiralty Signals Establishment designing radar detection systems.

Bondi, like Gold, a native of Vienna who had gone to England in the late 1930s, related how he, Gold and colleague Fred Hoyle (also to become a distinguished astronomer) were working for the British war effort and living in a rented farmhouse in Surrey, outside London. The three collaborated until 1949, and together developed the now disproved steady state theory of the expansion of the universe. Gold, said Bondi, was a "phenomenon."

Dyson met Gold at Cambridge in 1946 when "Tommy" was developing a model of a positive feedback mechanism in the inner ear to explain his theory of hearing, a theory that was for many years soundly rejected. Said Dyson: "It took about 30 years before the audio-physiological community admitted that he was right, and they were wrong."

"Prof. Thomas "Tommy" Gold"

by

Larry Klaes

October 20th, 2004

Ithaca Times

Legendary Cornell professor Thomas "Tommy" Gold was honored by family, friends, and colleagues at the university's Barnes Hall last Wednesday afternoon [13 October 2004].

With an image of a smiling Professor Gold on a large wall screen in the background, Joseph Veverka, chairman of Cornell's Department of Astronomy, introduced the memorial service for Gold as a gathering "to remember and honor a very special person."

Gold, who died at the age of 84 of complications from a heart attack June 22, was called "the Father of Astronomy at Cornell," by Veverka. When Gold arrived at the university from Harvard in 1959, the Cornell Astronomy Department had only one professor. It was Gold who was instrumental in turning the department into the world-class institution it is today. Gold also convinced Cornell to invite another legendary figure in astronomy to join the department faculty in 1968: Carl Sagan.

Gold was well known for his ideas that did not follow the beaten path but were still grounded in solid science. His subjects were also wide-ranging. Though he was not always right in the end, it was the fact that he searched beyond the mainstream that mattered; and when Gold was right, it brought about a new way of thinking and looking at our world.

In the 1940s, Gold studied whether the ear determined the pitch of sounds by either mechanisms in the ear itself or in the brain. Gold decided that it was something in the ear, but physiologists in the field would reject his theory for over 30 years, until medical science had advanced enough to prove Gold right.

Along with his friends the late Fred Hoyle and Sir Hermann Bondi, who came all the way from London for the memorial, Gold developed the Steady State theory of the Universe. This theory said that the Universe had always existed and that new matter was being created for it all the time.

Though the Steady State idea has since been rejected by most scientists in favor of the Big Bang theory of cosmic creation, Gold never totally gave up on the idea and was "not embarrassed at all about his idea of universal origin," said Robert Hefner III. Almost as an aside, Hefner asked if perhaps the recent concept of infinite universes being created by an infinite number of Big Bangs is just a variation on the Steady State theory.

During the 1960s when the United States was preparing to place astronauts on Earth's moon with the Apollo program, the Cornell professor was concerned that Earth's moon was covered in a deep layer of dust that would cause any spacecraft trying to land on that surface to sink. Thankfully, this idea turned out to be wrong: there is a layer of dust across the lunar surface, but it is uniform, averaging only a few inches deep.

One theory that Gold was especially proud of was his idea on the nature of pulsars. When these strange celestial objects were first discovered in 1967, no one was quite sure what was making a steady, regular radio pulse from the vicinity of the Crab Nebula, the site of an ancient supernova, or stellar explosion. Some scientists even speculated the pulses might be artificial in origin.

Gold theorized that they might be the remains of that destroyed sun in the form of a rapidly rotating neutron star. His theory turned out to be right. Cornell astronomer Yervant Terzian went so far as to say that Gold "should have gotten the Nobel Prize for it, but never did."

Gold's daughter, Lauren, who said he was "unlike any of my other friend's dads" when she was growing up, summed up her father and his distinguished career thusly: "My dad wove his own fabric with carefully chosen threads."

Thomas Gold

Two Thomas Gold papers:

A natural phenomenon that may pose a severe aircraft hazard?

The solar sail and the mirror

The Mars Rover boys--5 years


Cheaper and safer than a shuttle...Spirit and Opportunity are still provoding data.

"Mars Rovers Powering On After 5 years"

by

Dauna Coulter

March 27th, 2009

Science@NASA

In January 2004, NASA landed two identical robotic rovers named Spirit and Opportunity on the surface of Mars. The twins were primed for a brief 3-month mission to tell us a story of water and possibly life itself in the planet's past.

More than five years later, the dynamic duo are still roving the Red Planet, engaged in a saga of overachievement that has transformed Mars exploration

"Spirit and Opportunity helped invent a whole new discipline - robotic field science," says Steve Squyres, principal investigator for the Mars Exploration Rover Mission.

"They've taught us how to organize large teams of scientists and engineers to operate robotic rovers on a distant planet. We all had to learn to work together effectively year after year to squeeze the most possible science from the rovers."

The teams are still squeezing.

Among the remarkable findings from these solar-powered robots over the half-decade: Mars wasn't always as cold and dry as it is today. Maybe it didn't look like a set for The Sound of Music, but it had water and was warm enough for life.

Mars Exploration Mission team members have also learned the perils of maneuvering robotic rovers located a hundred million kilometers away. They've gotten the vehicles stuck more than once.

"We now know how to negotiate sand dunes and piles of rocks," says Squyres, "and perhaps more importantly - how to avoid them. We've translated five years of experience into new and improved maps and driving software that will help us in the remainder of our mission, and will also help future rovers."

Hopeful planners are already setting future operations for the twins, assuming the pair will continue to plow ahead but acknowledging that one or both of the rovers could fail at any time. After all, these robots aren't exactly spring chickens. Spirit has been driving backwards since one of its wheels jammed in 2006, and a broken electrical wire has reduced movement of Opportunity's robotic arm.

Provided the twins hold up a while longer, here are the latest plans:

Opportunity, "the lucky vehicle since day 1" according to Squyres, has been crater-hopping since the beginning of the mission and is now heading south to the largest crater yet. The Endeavor crater is 20 km in diameter and 100s of meters deep.

"We'll have to double the odometer reading on a five year old vehicle to get there," says Squyres. "And it will take at least two years to reach it. [100 meters per day is an average day for Opportunity.] It'll be a long march across the plains, but it will be well worth it. The deeper the crater the older the history of Mars we can look at."

Ray Arvidson, deputy principal investigator, elaborates: "Endeavor is an intriguing target because the rocks close to it look different from the ones surrounding the other craters Opportunity has visited. Part of Endeavor crater's rim is sticking up - Mars' ancient bedrock exposed - and rocks nearby may be suggestive of acidic lakes on Mars' surface billions of years ago."

And what about the other twin?

"Spirit is the more challenging rover to operate," says Squyres. "There's not as much wind at its location to clean the solar arrays, and that affects the vehicle's power. Also, Spirit has to travel a more challenging terrain. The rocks and loose sand at Spirit's location are treacherous. Of course, to top it all off, Spirit is driving backwards."

"Luckily, Spirit's landing site features a compact geology with enormous diversity and variability in a all area."

Spirit is now creeping steadily along a route to von Braun, an interesting looking mesa-shaped cap-rock that stands only about 250 meters away but will take months to reach. Then Spirit will head to a 30-meter diameter pit that may be a volcanic explosion crater - and perhaps a location for hydrothermal activity.

"Because of the geology of its surroundings, Spirit specializes in looking for evidence in the rock record of water-charged explosive volcani," says Arvidson. "Such areas could have once supported life."

"Home Plate, where Spirit spent the winter, is a volcanic structure eroded down so we can see the layers," explains Arvidson. "And we think von Braun and the neighboring Goddard structure may be made of the same stuff."

The Mars Exploration Team members have high hopes for the rovers to achieve all these ambitious goals but are mindful of the twins' limitations.

"We have no way of knowing what the future holds for the rovers at this point," says Squyres. "The mission could easily end tomorrow. But, the miracle could continue."

Arvidson recalls the day, over five years ago, when Spirit first touched down on the red planet.

"I was on a plane on my way back from Hawaii, headed to the Los Angeles airport, when Spirit was due to land. I just had to know if the rover had made it, so I asked the pilot to radio ahead to air traffic controllers and find out if Spirit had landed safely. I was overjoyed when he did so and confirmed that Spirit was sitting on Mars' surface, ready to go!"

Spirit is still going, Opportunity is still going, and Arvidson is still overjoyed.

Moon images enhanced


I am not in favor of total digital enhancement of photographic images. Too much room for human bias. Disclaimers must be issued when a photo is enhanced.

"Old Moon Images Get Modern Makeover"

by

Leonard David

March 31st, 2009

SPACE.com

WOODLANDS, Texas — Images of the moon gleaned from NASA spacecraft more than 40 years ago are now getting a 21st century makeover thanks to the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project (LOIRP).

Back in 1966 and 1967, NASA hurled a series of Lunar Orbiter spacecraft to the moon. Each of the five orbiters were dispatched to map the landscape in high-resolution and assist in charting where best to set down Apollo moonwalkers and open up the lunar surface to expanded human operations.

By gathering the vintage hardware to playback the imagery, and then upgrading it to digital standards, researchers have yielded a strikingly fresh look at the old moon. Furthermore, LOIRP's efforts may also lead to retrieving and beefing up video from the first human landing on the moon by Apollo 11 astronauts in July 1969.

Digital domain

Dennis Wingo, LOIRP's team leader, detailed the group's work in progress during last week's 40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.

Teamed with SpaceRef.com, LOIRP's saga is one of acquiring the last surviving Ampex FR-900 machinery that can play analog image data from the Lunar Orbiter spacecraft. Wingo noted that the work is backed by NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, the space agency's Innovative Partnership Program, along with private organizations, making it possible to overhaul old equipment, digitally upgrade and clean-up the imagery via software.

LOIRP is located at NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif. There, project members are taking the analog data, converting it into digital form and reconstructing the images.

By moving them into the digital domain, Wingo said, the photos now offer a higher dynamic range and resolution than the original pictures, he added.

"We're going to be releasing these to the whole world," Wingo said.

Use of the refreshed images, contrasted to what NASA's upcoming Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission is slated to produce, has an immediate scientific benefit. That is, what is the frequency of impacts on the Moon's already substantially crater-pocked surface?

"We'll be able to get crater counts," Wingo told SPACE.com. "LRO imagery of the same terrain imaged decades ago will provide a crater count over the last 40 years."

Frozen in time

There's also a more down to Earth output thanks to LOIRP scientists.

They have used a Lunar Orbiter 1 image of the Earth for climate studies, basically a snapshot frozen in time that shows the edge of the Antarctic ice pack on August 23, 1966.

The team is working with the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado to correlate their images of the Earth with old NASA Nimbus 1 and Nimbus 2 spacecraft imagery that flew at about the same time — in the mid-1960s — as the Lunar Orbiter 1. Nimbus satellites were meteorological research and development spacecraft.

Wingo said that the original Nimbus images may have been recorded on an Ampex FR-900 — so by processing the original Nimbus tapes there is a very good chance that they can provide NASA with polar ice pack data from ten years earlier.

Lessons learned

One treasure hunt outing by LOIRP may lead to finding what some term as "lost" Apollo 11 slow scan tapes, Wingo said.

"We don't think they are lost. People have been looking for the wrong tapes," he said, explaining that they were recorded on Ampex FR-900 equipment — not on another type of recorder as previously thought.

Wingo said those Apollo tapes are stored at the Federal Records Center, labeled and ready for a look see.

"We think for the 40th anniversary of Apollo we may be able to get the original slow scan tapes," Wingo said. If so, the hope is to recover them and give the public a higher-quality, never-before-seen view of human exploration of the Moon.

There is a lesson learned output from LOIRP.

"In the beginning, very few people thought this could be done...but now they have seen the results," Wingo said.

It is not enough to have 100 year recording medium, Wingo explains. Without the retention of the specific era equipment that images are archived on, it will be impossible for future generations to recover older NASA or other satellite data, he advised.

This is a general issue, not specific to the Lunar Orbiter program. The retention of critical hardware should be a requirement for flight efforts. The original historic Apollo 11 slow scan images have been lost due to inattention to this critical detail, Wingo concluded.

Philadelphia and Galileo's telescope


"Courtship of the spyglass"

How the Franklin Institute wooed the only remaining functional telescope made by Galileo out of Florence to celebrate astronomy and "the father of modern physics."

by

Christopher Yasiejko

April 2nd, 2009

Philadelphia The Inquirer

The Italian museum's director pulled out a stack of letters and, one by one, laid them atop his desk at the Institute and Museum of the History of Science in Florence.

It was late 2007 and appeals were pouring in from museums in China, Korea, Germany, New York, Chicago, and a host of cities around the globe, though the International Year of Astronomy was still more than a year away.

"Tutti vogliono il mio telescopio," Paolo Galluzzi said. "Everyone wants my telescope," the only remaining functional telescope made by Galileo Galilei, whom Albert Einstein called "the father of modern physics - indeed, of modern science altogether."

Martha McGeary Snider, a Philadelphia philanthropist and board chair of the Medici Archive Project, was in Florence that day, scanning the letter-cloaked desktop.

"It was intimidating," she recalled this week. But in the end, Philadelphia's Franklin Institute won exclusive rights to exhibit the telescope, along with a trove of artifacts that belonged to the Medicis, the powerful Florentine family whose prosperity and influence spanned the 14th through the 18th centuries.

It is the first instance since Galileo's time that the instrument, 3 feet long and looking like a weathered cardboard tube, has left Florence.

"Galileo, the Medici, and the Age of Astronomy," timed to coincide with the International Year of Astronomy and the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first "spyglass," opens Saturday, marking the consummation of what Snider and Dennis Wint, the Franklin's president and chief executive, have called a long, and challenging, courtship.

When Wint met in Italy with Snider and Galluzzi in late 2007, he was coming off the Franklin's hugely successful leg of the traveling "King Tut and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs" exhibition, which drew 1.37 million visitors. That, plus its reputation as a preeminent science institution, and Philadelphia's location in the Northeast Corridor, helped convince the Italians that the Franklin was prepared to host some of their most revered artifacts.

Galluzzi and his museum wanted to be a presenter, not just a lender, and they have been involved throughout the preparations. Three Italian curators have overseen the protection, movement and placement of the telescope and other instruments that belonged to Galileo, as well as paintings of Medicis, prints, manuscripts, and their hands-on virtual counterparts.

Even before advancing to the exhibition's interactive playpen of optics, which might assuage those pining to press an eye to Galileo's untouchable 400-year-old lens, visitors will notice light glinting off brass tools, whose crisp inscriptions and hash marks belie their ages and utility. Their ornamental designs suggest that such tools were considered objects of art unto themselves, inanimate soldiers in an army of possessions the Medicis saw as symbols of their influence.

(After his late-1609 discovery of four moons orbiting Jupiter - which he named after the Medicis - Galileo successfully lobbied Grand Duke Cosimo II to sponsor his work. Celebrity followed. In an irony not lost on Snider, the legacy of the Medicis now is being amplified by the ongoing popularity of one of their many beneficiaries.)

"There were lots of institutions that wanted only the telescope," Wint says. "That's not sufficiently comprehensive for us. And so the bigger story of Galileo and the context of the time is really the story that we wanted to tell, and that's what makes it so unique here."

"Galileo" is what Wint calls a mission exhibition. It doesn't have the glitz or popular appeal of blockbusters like those that have featured Tut, "Body Worlds," the Titanic, Star Wars or, opening in May, Star Trek. Those shows provide the profit margin that makes exhibitions such as "Galileo" possible.

"The business model is 'no margin, no mission,' " he says. "You may have the greatest mission in the world, but you can't sustain it. 'Galileo' allows us to say, 'This is our mission. It is unique, it is once-in-a-lifetime, only in Philadelphia, only in the United States, one of only two sites in the world - it's here.'"

"To what extent will our audience respond to a heavily historic exhibition is a question. Even if the attendance is relatively small, we would still do it because it's so important. It's such an important story to be told."

In March 1610, Galileo sent Cosimo II, the fourth grand duke of Tuscany and a Medici whom he had taught as a child, a treatise called "Starry Messenger." He wrote that he had devised a "spyglass" and had seen the face of the moon, fixed and nebulous stars, and the Milky Way. But his focus was "four planets flying around the star of Jupiter at unequal intervals and periods with wonderful swiftness; which, unknown by anyone until this day," he named "the Medicean Stars."

It was a tantalizing stroke - Galileo, claiming God had "admonished me" to do so, had granted to mortals the naming rights to heavenly bodies, which until then belonged only to mythological figures. He became the Medicis' highest-paid employee of his time.

For Derrick Pitts, the Franklin Institute's chief astronomer (and, on Monday night's Colbert Report, Galileo's entree into late-night television), the arrival and unpacking of the telescope - one of two that have survived since Galileo's time - was "a semi-religious experience."

During that brief part of an afternoon last week, no barrier separated him from the tool that today seems quaint when compared to most amateur telescopes, let alone to one of its most productive descendants, the Hubble Space Telescope.

"Here I am, standing inches away from the instrument that opened the heavens to astronomical research," Pitts says. "And here I am at the tool of a master, someone who not only crafted the telescope, but had the wherewithal to really understand the implications of what it was he was doing."

Galileo's work helped establish the scientific method. It led to Isaac Newton's laws of motion and, eventually, to Einstein's special theory of relativity.

It also led to his epic rift with the Catholic Church. But that's a tale better left to the exhibition itself.

The agreement to send the artifacts to Philadelphia was galvanized, Snider says, as she and Wint dined with Galluzzi in Florence in late 2007. She watched the two of them talking, and her eyes briefly caught Wint's.

Later, as they walked along the cobblestone streets, "that's when I felt like my feet weren't quite touching the ground. And we just looked at each other, and Dennis said, 'You know what? I think this might happen.' "


Galileo's telescope in Philadelphia

Deceased--Martin J. Klein

Martin J. Klein
June 25th, 1924 to March 28th, 2009

"Martin J. Klein, Historian of Physics, Dies at 84"

by

Dennis Hevesi

April 2, 2009

New York Times

Martin J. Klein, a historian of modern physics and the editor of a vast collection of papers that documented the years in which Albert Einstein completed his revolutionary work on the general theory of relativity, died Saturday in Chapel Hill, N.C. He was 84 and lived in Chapel Hill.

His death was confirmed by his daughter Rona.

Dr. Klein, originally a physicist, was editor of "The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein" (Princeton University Press) from 1988 to 1998. The project started in the mid-1970s and has so far published 11 volumes of Einstein's scientific and personal papers. Dr. Klein led the team that produced Volumes 3 through 6, covering 1909 through 1917.

Einstein published his general theory of relativity in 1916. In simple terms, it states that matter curves space and space moves matter, and is the foundation for the modern understanding of the evolution of the universe.

But, as Diana K. Buchwald, the current editor of the Einstein Papers Project, now based at the California Institute of Technology, said: "Before he became editor of the Einstein papers, Dr. Klein's reputation as a major historian of physics had already been established. He published a number of remarkable papers, investigations of the birth and the foundation of modern physics."

Dr. Klein had done previous work on Einstein and had analyzed the research of Einstein's fellow physicists Max Planck, Erwin Schrödinger, Niels Bohr, Josiah Willard Gibbs and Paul Ehrenfest. In 1970, he published a biography, "Paul Ehrenfest: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist" (North Holland Publishing Company). Dr. Ehrenfest, a friend of Einstein’s, made major contributions in statistical mechanics and its relation to quantum mechanics.

From 1949 to 1966, Dr. Klein was a physics professor at the Case Institute of Technology in Cleveland, now Case Western Reserve University. There he evolved from teaching physics to teaching its history. In 1967, he joined the faculty of Yale, and four years later became chairman of its department of science history.

While at Yale, he took over as editor of the Einstein project. His research team dealt with the years during which Einstein moved from his early accomplishments — the theory of special relativity and papers on Brownian motion and the photoelectric effect, which postulated that light behaves as if it were particles as well as waves — to his work on general relativity. General relativity deals with gravity and is the basis for conclusions about such colossal phenomena as the Big Bang, the birth and death of stars, black holes and the expansion of the universe.

In 2005, Dr. Klein won the Abraham Pais Prize, the first major award for the history of physics. The citation said his work had "profoundly influenced generations of historians of physics."

Martin Jesse Klein was born in the Bronx on June 25, 1924, the only child of Adolph and Mary Neuman Klein, both schoolteachers. At 14, he graduated from James Monroe High School. He received a bachelor’s degree in math at Columbia University in 1942 and a master's degree in physics there in 1944, then received a Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1948.

Dr. Klein's first two marriages, to Miriam Levin and Linda Booz, ended in divorce. His third wife, Joan Blewett, died in 2006. Besides his daughter Rona, he is survived by two other daughters from his first marriage, Sarah Zaino and Nancy Klein; and a daughter from his second marriage, Abby Klein.

At James Monroe High School, Martin Klein shared his passion for science with Leon M. Lederman; 50 years later, Dr. Lederman won the Nobel Prize for physics.

"He was way younger than me; it was embarrassing, " Dr. Lederman said Tuesday of Dr. Klein. "He won most of the awards at graduation: the chemistry prize, the history prize, English composition. There aren't many like him with a thorough knowledge of physics and the ability to put it into historical context."

Martin J. Klein

Einstein and the wave-particle duality
ASIN: B0007GWQAY

Physicists' Inaugural Lectures in History
ISBN-10: 9053560572
ISBN-13: 978-905356057

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 1, The Early Years: 1879-1902
ISBN 0-691-08407-6

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 2, The Swiss Years: Writings, 1900-1909
ISBN 0-691-08526-9

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 3, The Swiss Years: Writings, 1909-1911
ISBN 0-691-08772-5

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 4, The Swiss Years: Writings, 1912-1914
ISBN 0-691-03705-1

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 5, The Swiss Years: Correspondence, 1902-1914
ISBN 0-691-03322-6

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 6, The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914-1917
ISBN 0-691-01086-2

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 7, The Berlin Years: Writings, 1918-1921
ISBN 0-691-05717-6

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, The Berlin Years: Correspondence, 1914-1918
ISBN 0-691-04849-5

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 9, The Berlin Years: Correspondence, January 1919 - April 1920
ISBN 0-691-12088-9

The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 10, The Berlin Years: Correspondence, May-December 1920, and Supplementary Correspondence, 1909-1920
ISBN 0-691-12825-1

"Nuclear accident" poll


Do you think that there will be other world-wide nuclear power plant "accidents"?

Yes...4
No...2

Despite routine maintenance, safety checks, and safety shutdowns, accidents will happen: Human error, equipment malfunction [sticky steam valves, cracked pipes, electrical components], computer glitches.


Man-Made Disasters - Nuclear Accidents

by

Mark Mayell

ISBN-10: 1590180569
ISBN-13: 978-159018056

If you wish to keep track of nuclear industry events, you may subscribe to the Nuclear Power Daily newsletter.