I received my MA in philosophy of science many years ago and currently reviving my academic interests. I hope to stimulate individuals in the realms of science, philosophy and the arts...to provide as much free information as possible.
Well, Earth isn't "Ardilla", but the concept of the development and deployment of such a weapon, even in its mildest and intentionally benign form, is thick with ethical issues. It was recently revealed that electromagnetic beams were being tested on humans as a means of crowd control. Good and well-meaning intentions often get derailed into something totally different than the original purpose. Given the fact that people are different from one another in attire [some having more metal attachments] and possibly physical devices [metal pins and plates] of a life saving nature, the use of such a device could cause serious injury or death. Line up lawyers for a zillion "wrongful death" suits. Pity the protestor with a pocket full of coins. Also, one has to define what is meant by "crowd control". It is a given here that it is legal to gather and protest. Some persons in a current administration may consider a pro stem cell demonstration threatening and zap the crowd with a dose of electromagnetism. Would it be a legal means of crowd control?
No comments:
Post a Comment