tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5216738179263317509.post7063429137101536023..comments2024-01-08T00:25:24.777-08:00Comments on Philosophy of Science Portal: Einstein: Spiritual and the scientificMercuryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13757909461674304095noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5216738179263317509.post-75998554839138425662008-12-07T08:16:00.000-08:002008-12-07T08:16:00.000-08:00When Is God-Science Discussable Scientifically Re ...When Is God-Science Discussable Scientifically <BR/><BR/><BR/>Re "God and Evolution Can Co-Exist, Scientist Insists"<BR/>http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/304.page#1124<BR/><BR/><BR/>- Is there/what is, in the quoted article, a definition of the article's "god" ?<BR/><BR/>- Specifically, is the rticle's "god" defined as a human artifact, or not ?<BR/><BR/>If "god" is defined/understood to be a human artifact - regardless of reasons, purposes, implications, consequences - the subject "god-science" is scientifically discussable.<BR/><BR/>If "god" is not defined/understood to be a human artifact, its concept is a human virtual reality <BR/>artifact experienced only through sensory stimuli, and "god-science" is not scientifically discussable. Furthermore, in this case preoccupation with this subject within a scientific frameworks contributes to corrosion and corruption of science and scientism by manifesting or implying acceptance of virtual reality as reality. <BR/><BR/>"Evolutionary Biology Of Culture And Religion"<BR/>http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/20/122.page#492<BR/><BR/><BR/>Dov Henis<BR/><BR/>(A DH Comment From The 22nd Century)<BR/> http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1<BR/><BR/> Life's Manifest<BR/> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578Dov Henishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06487907863785174174noreply@blogger.com